LogoLogo
  • 01 ReSource Finance
    • Glossary
    • Executive Summary
  • 02 Mutual Credit
    • 2.1 Definitions and Rationale
    • 2.2 History
    • 2.3 WIR Bank
    • 2.3.1 Modern Multilateral Barter Networks
    • 2.4 Mutual Credit on the Blockchain
    • 2.5 The Basic Economic Questions for DLT-based Mutual Credit Systems
  • 03 The ReSource Protocol
    • 3.1 Introduction
    • 3.2 Distributed debt collection and obligation enforcement
    • 3.3 Distributed risk management
    • 3.4 Underwriting and risk assumption
    • 3.5 The Underwriting process - a breakdown
    • 3.6 Ambassadors and network administration
  • 04 Monetary Flow, Reserves, Default Insurance
    • 4.1 Introduction
    • 4.2 Default Insurance
    • 4.3 RSD Savings Accounts
    • 4.4 RSD Autonomous stability and relation to the US Dollar
    • 4.4.1 RSD/USD Soft Peg
    • 4.4.2 RSD on the Open Market
    • 4.5 SOURCE Token Dynamics
    • 4.6 Monetary Buffering
  • 05 Protocol and Network Governance
    • 5.1 Introduction
    • 5.2 Reputation
    • 5.3 SOURCE Governance Token
    • 5.4 Initial SOURCE Allocation and Distribution
  • 06 Application Layer
    • 6.1 Introduction
    • 6.2 The Underwriting dApp
    • 6.3 The Ambassador dApp
    • 6.3 The Pool Aggregator
    • 6.4 The ReSource Marketplace
  • 07 TECHNOLOGY
    • 07 Overview
    • 7.1 Negative Balances & CIP36
    • 7.2 Non-custodial Key Management
    • 7.3 The Marketplace
    • 7.4 Distributed Underwriting and Data Aggregation
    • 7.5 Financial Data & Data Providers
    • 7.6 ReSource Credit Risk Analysis Algorithm
    • 7.7 “Pay with ReSource"
    • 7.8 Cross-network liquidity pools for interoperability
  • 08 Future Industrial Use Cases for the ReSource Protocol
    • 08 Overview
    • 8.1 Telecommunication
    • 8.2 Complex Supply Chain Financing
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. 05 Protocol and Network Governance

5.1 Introduction

The development of the ReSource Protocol is guided by a Swiss association, bylaws of which can be found in appendix A to this paper. This Swiss Association, named “The ReSource Protocol DAO” is mainly concerned with the furthering of the protocol’s code-base and the open-source community developing it, however it may also represent the different networks built on top of the protocol layer while directly governing the ReSource Network itself.

Other mutual credit networks, built on ReSource, will be directed by DAOs representing the network’s stakeholders. The exact terms and scopes of DAO governance may vary from network to network; the terms below[1] describe the ones set for the ReSource Network by the ReSource Protocol DAO.

Decisions concerning the operations of the ReSource Network, such as interest rates, Underwriter whitelists, member acquisition, and reserve policies, will be subject to public votes. Voting rights will be assigned to participants in proportion to 1) SOURCE staked in one of the network’s underwriting pools, and 2) a reputation score.

Staked SOURCE grant their owners asymptotically diminishing voting rights. This means that the first staked SOURCE is counted as one vote, while the second staked SOURCE is counted as 0.90 votes, the third 0.85, and so on. Reputation scores, on the other hand, grant their owners voting rights in direct proportion to their scores.

Since Reputation is a direct, sybil-resilient, and non-transferable result of productive network activity, this hybrid model ensures that the ReSource Network remains governed by its stakeholders and can’t easily be subjected to hostile takeovers.

Previous4.6 Monetary BufferingNext5.2 Reputation

Last updated 3 years ago

Was this helpful?